|
No.
|
Information Products and Services Indicator
|
IR 1.0: Global leadership demonstrated
|
IR 2.0: Knowledge generated, organized & communicated
|
IR 3.0: Support provided to the field
|
|
|
REACH
|
|
|
|
|
|
Area 1: Primary Distribution (Push)
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
Number of copies of a product initially distributed to existing lists
|
|
IR 2.3
|
|
|
2
|
Number of copies of a product distributed by a publisher through additional distribution
|
|
IR 2.3
|
|
|
|
Area 2: Secondary Distribution (Pull)
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
Numbers of products distributed in response to orders
|
|
IR 2.3
|
|
|
4
|
Number of file downloads in a time period
|
|
IR 2.3
|
|
|
5
|
Number of times a product is reprinted by recipients
|
|
IR 2.3
|
|
|
6
|
Number of people reached by media coverage of the material or generated by it
|
|
IR 2.3
|
|
|
|
Area 3: Referrals
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
Number of instances that products are indexed or archived in bibliographic databases
|
|
IR 2.3
|
|
|
8
|
Number of postings of products by other Web sites or links to products from other Web sites
|
|
IR 2.3
|
|
|
9
|
Number of instances that products are selected for inclusion in a library
|
|
IR 2.3
|
|
|
10
|
Percentage of users who share their copies or transmit information verbally to colleagues
|
|
IR 2.3
|
|
|
|
USEFULNESS
|
|
|
|
|
|
Area 1: User Satisfaction
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
Percentage of those receiving a product or service who have read or browsed it
|
|
IR 2.3
|
|
|
12
|
Percentage of users who are satisfied with a product or service
|
|
IR 2.3
|
|
|
13
|
Percentage of users who rate the format or presentation of a product or service as usable
|
|
IR 2.3
|
|
|
14
|
Percentage of users who rate the content of a product or service as useful
|
|
IR 2.3
|
|
|
15
|
Number/percentage of users who report knowledge gained from a product or service
|
|
IR 2.3
|
|
|
16
|
Number/percentage of users who report that a product or service changed their views
|
|
IR 2.3
|
|
|
|
Area 2: Product or Service Quality
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
Number and quality assessment of reviews of a product in periodicals
|
|
IR 2.1 & IR 2.3
|
|
|
18
|
Number and significance of awards given to a product or service
|
|
IR 2.1 & IR 2.3
|
|
|
19
|
Number of citations of a journal article or other information product
|
IR 1.1
|
IR 2.1 & IR 2.3
|
IR 3.1
|
|
20
|
Journal impact factor
|
|
IR 2.1 & IR 2.3
|
|
|
21
|
Number/percentage of users who pay for a product or service
|
|
IR 2.3
|
|
|
22
|
Number/percentage of information products or services guided by theories of behavior change and communication
|
|
IR 2.3
|
|
|
|
USE
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
Number/percentage of users intending to use an information product or service
|
IR 1.1
|
IR 2.1
|
IR 3.1
|
|
24
|
Number/percentage of users adapting information products or services
|
IR 1.1
|
IR 2.1
|
IR 3.1
|
|
25
|
Number/percentage of users using an information product or service to inform policy and advocacy or to enhance programs, training, education, or research
|
IR 1.1
|
IR 2.1
|
IR 3.1
|
|
26
|
Number/percentage of users using an information product or service to improve their own practice or performance
|
IR 1.1
|
IR 2.1
|
IR 3.1
|
|
|
COLLABORATION & CAPACITY BUILDING
|
|
|
|
|
|
Area 1: Collaboration
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
Number of instances of products or services developed or disseminated with partners
|
IR 1.2
& IR 1.3
|
|
IR 3.3
|
|
28
|
Number of instances of South-to-South or South-to-North information sharing
|
|
IR 2.3
|
IR 3.1
& IR 3.3
|
|
|
Area 2: Capacity Building
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
Number and type of capacity-building efforts
|
|
|
IR 3.3
|
|
IR 1.0: Global leadership demonstrated in FP/RH policy, advocacy, and services
|
IR 2.0: Knowledge generated, organized and communicated in response to field needs
|
IR 3.0: Support provided to the field to implement effective and sustainable FP/RH programs
|
|
1.1 Tools, protocols, procedures, systems, methodologies, guides, curricula, indices and/or key actionable findings incorporated into the work of other organizations
|
2.1 Tools, protocols, procedures, systems, methodologies, guides, curricula or indices with demonstrated programmatic value validated, scaled up, and/or replicated in contexts other than where they were originally developed.
|
3.1 Contraceptive methods, tools, protocols, procedures, systems, methodologies, guides, curricula, indices, and/or key actionable findings incorporated into mission or country programs (incorporation may be core or FS-funded, bilateral, HC gov’t or other donor funded) or adopted/applied by other CAs
|
|
1.2 Resources leveraged globally for FP/RH activities from non-USAID sources by core or FS funds
|
2.2 Key actionable findings and experiences identified, generated, pooled, or summarized and their lessons extracted
|
3.2 Percentage of total contraceptive shipments that are shipped on time (within one month from the desired ship date)
|
|
1.3 Number of partnerships with organizations that do not traditionally focus on FP/RH
|
2.3 Target audiences reached with tools, protocols, procedures, systems, methodologies, guides, curricula, indices, key actionable findings (i.e., the products reported in 2.1 and/or 2.2)
|
3.3 Organizational capacity to undertake activity as measured on a continuum from:
- implementing w/significant TA
- implementing/replicating with limited TA
- implementing/replicating independently
- serving as a resource for others/leveraging resources
|
|
|
2.4 Number of new and current contraceptive leads/methods under development or evaluation; advancing to the next stage; and/or approved by FDA
|
3.4 Number of missions using PRH-designed or PRH-managed mechanisms for program implementation (includes non-PRH projects that PRH co-manages)
|
|
|
|
3.5 Ratio of field support to core funding within centrally funded projects designed to support the field, disaggregated by Pop FS/Pop core and all FS/all core
|
|
|
|
3.6 TA visits by PRH staff to support field programs
|
|
|
|
3.7 Percent of respondents based in missions that report being satisfied with TA provided by USAID/W and/or GH CAs
|
|
Document or Publication Type (Format, Length, Medium)
|
Purposes and Objectives
|
Illustrative Audiences
|
Examples
|
|
Project and technical reports (unpublished)
|
Fulfill reporting requirements (periodic report, trip report, progress report)
|
Donors
|
Quarterly, semi-annual, annual reports to USAID
|
|
Evaluation, evaluation report, or assessment study
|
Inform client organizations about successes and improvements needed, fulfill reporting requirements
|
Client organizations, CAs, donors
|
Population Council/ FRONTIERS: Final reports
|
|
Case studies
|
Serve as teaching or training materials, illustrate lessons learned
|
Health professionals, trainers, CAs
|
AED, Speak for the Child: Community Care for Orphans and AIDS-Affected Children, Case Study, Kenya
|
|
Technical update/note/brief, policy brief, research summary
|
Communicate technical or policy experience or research findings in short format for wide audience, sometimes for a specific country or region
|
Health professionals and managers worldwide or in- country, policymakers, CAs, donors
|
Population Council/ FRONTIERS: OR summaries;
INFO Project: Global Health Technical Briefs;
AGI: Facts in Brief, Issues in Brief, Research in Brief
|
|
Information, Education, and Communication (IEC) materials
|
Provide information to the public; health education, health communication and promotion
|
Clients, patients, communities
|
Poster or flier for local use; radio program, brochures on personal health and healthy behaviors
|
|
Success story or project final report
|
Illustrate partnerships and share successes with implementing organizations and donors
|
Donors, CAs, client organizations, health managers
|
FHI: Addressing Health Worker Shortages
|
|
Occasional paper, white paper, working/issue/ concept/position paper
|
Provide wide, low-cost access to discussions of timely topics
|
Professional/technical audiences
|
Population Council: Policy Research Division Working Papers
|
|
User's guide with CD-ROM or for software
|
Provide tools to implement specific public health or management functions and improvements; guide people in using software
|
Health workers, program or facility managers at multiple levels
|
MSH: Financial Management Assessment Tool (FIMAT);
JSI: ProQ User's Manual
|
|
Interactive CD-ROM
|
Serve as an interactive learning/training tool and/or means for sharing large volume of information in a widely accessible format
|
Various audiences (dependent on subject)
|
URC: Health Journalism CD-ROM
|
|
Technical poster
|
Summarize data or state-of-the-art information for quick reference
|
Professional/technical audiences
|
Population Reference Bureau: World Population Data Sheet
|