HIPNET - Health Information and Publications Network

Part II: Indicators That Measure Reach

REACH INDICATORS

No.

 

 

Area 1: Primary Distribution (Push)

1

Number of copies of a product initially distributed to existing lists

2

Number of copies of a product distributed by a publisher through additional distribution

 

Area 2: Secondary Distribution (Pull)

3

Numbers of products distributed in response to orders

4

Number of file downloads in a time period

5

Number of times a product is reprinted by recipients

6

Number of people reached by media coverage of the material or generated by it

 

Area 3: Referrals

7

Number of instances that products are indexed or archived in bibliographic databases

8

Number of postings of products by other Web sites or links to products from other Web sites

9

Number of instances that products are selected for inclusion in a library

Percentage of users who share their copies or transmit information verbally to colleagues

 

This section describes indicators that measure the reach of information products. “Reach” is defined as the breadth and saturation of dissemination, distribution, or referral of the product in both hard copy and/or electronic forms. The purpose of measuring reach is to quantify dissemination so as to inform the planning, promotion, and budgeting of current and future information products and services, and to improve management of product development and printing. Measuring reach also can provide valuable information on the extent to which products get into the hands of intended audiences.

 

Indicators for reach are grouped into three main areas:

(1)   Primary distribution of the product by the publisher,

(2)   Secondary distribution as a result of user-initiated requests or downloads, and

(3)   Dissemination through referrals, such as Web site links, workshops, or word of mouth.

 

Primary distribution refers to distribution directly from the publisher to the end user or to a secondary distributor. The end user could be a person or organization on a mailing list or a subscriber to a specific information product—for example, a quarterly magazine. A subscriber may pay for the product or may receive the product at no cost.

Secondary distribution is user-initiated distribution that occurs after the initial mass mailing or listserv announcement. (A listserv is an email mailing or discussion list.) In secondary distribution the user requests or downloads the material.

 

Primary and secondary distribution relate to the Push-Pull Model for information in the health field. The Push-Pull Model represents the contrast between organizations investing resources in assumed areas of need—push—and populations requesting certain products or services—pull. Indicators under primary distribution refer to the “push” or supply side of the information market. Indicators listed under secondary distribution refer to the “pull,” or the demand side of the information market. There can be a slight overlap in “push” and “pull,” as a user may initially request to be placed on a mailing list, suggesting more of a “pull” than a “push.” After that initial “pull,” however, future unsolicited distribution is considered “push.” In addition, the result of publicity for publications is typically an increase in “pull,” or secondary distribution.

 

Indicators in the third area of reach—referral—relate to various means through which people can find their way to information resources through Web sites, databases, libraries, word of mouth, and other channels.

 

Unlike the other indicators under “referral,” the indicator “Number of instances that products are indexed or archived in bibliographic databases” relies on bibliometric research. Bibliometric data, as defined in Journal Citation Reports, arequantifiable statistical data that provide a systematic, objective way to evaluate products and services and their impact and influence in the global research community.”  One common way of conducting bibliometric research in the field of public health is to use PubMed or similar archives or indices to trace citations. Another area of bibliometric research uses citation analysis to examine linkages among authors through their works. Bibliometric research enables evaluators to determine the impact of a specific study or author on other research publications. In a sense, bibliometric data reflect, in a single measurement, both the reach of a publication in the scholarly or research community and the perceived value and relevance of its content.

 

Area 1: Primary distribution (Push)

 

Primary distribution refers to distribution directly from the publisher to the end user or to a secondary distributor.

 

Indicator 1:

 Number of copies of a product initially distributed to existing lists

 

Definition: This indicator refers to the first mass mailing to one or more existing lists (mailed to subscribers or to lists assembled for other purposes (e.g., trainees) or emailing to listservs, newsgroups, or individuals).

 

Data Requirement: Numbers of copies sent or numbers of recipients on mailing list, subscriber list, listserv subscribers, characteristics of subscribers (e.g., country of origin, type of organization, job type).

 

Data Source(s): Mailing list, subscriber list, listserv, class registration lists, conference or meeting attendee lists.

 

Purpose and Issues: This is one of the most basic indicators for measuring dissemination. While organizations continue to disseminate hard copies of products to institutional mailing or subscription lists, many organizations now enhance the scope of dissemination through electronic communication. For example, many organizations also use electronic forums to publicize or announce the availability of new products and to send electronic versions or Web links to potential users. Listservs present a challenge to evaluation because it may not be possible to track the number of subscribers for a given listserv if the organization does not moderate the listserv.

 

Example:

From July 1, 2005 to June 30, 2006, the INFO Project sent out a total of 342,103 copies of the Population Reports in English, French, and Spanish to subscribers on its mailing list.

 

In February 2002 the POLICY Project/Futures Group mailed 2,000 copies of “Reforming Operational Policies: A Pathway to Improving Reproductive Health Policies” to recipients on the Futures Group institutional mailing list.

 

Indicator 2:

Number of copies of a product distributed by a publisher through additional distribution

 

Definition: This indicator refers to distribution that occurs after the initial mass mailing. It is initiated by the publishing organization. For example, an organization may distribute selected products while carrying out technical assistance or e-learning activities, or at workshops, conferences, training sessions, and the annual meetings of professional associations.

 

Data Requirements: Number of copies, venue, and date distributed.

 

Data Source(s): Administrative records.

 

Purpose and Issues: This kind of secondary distribution (dissemination from the supply side) is important to track because it relates directly to the achievement of the goals of technical assistance, including capacity building. This indicator does not measure demand from users, but it does help track distribution that occurs in tandem with other, related events, which could have the effect of increasing the chances that the information will be understood and applied. This could also help build demand for the product.

 


Area 2: Secondary distribution (Pull)

 

 

 

Secondary distribution is further dissemination of products by the original publisher that may be either solicited or unsolicited.  As an example of solicited requests, a note distributed to colleagues might request them to order products as needed. These orders would be specifically requested by the users.  Similarly, finding a document when browsing the Web or conducting a database search and then downloading it is “pulling” information directly or indirectly from the publisher.

 

Indicator 3:

Numbers of products distributed in response to orders

 

Definition: “Orders” include any user-initiated method of requesting copies of a product, including telephone calls, email, mailing of an order form, online order form, requests to be placed on a mailing list, or asking a colleague from the publishing organization in person.

 

Data Requirements: Number of phone orders, emails, order forms, interpersonal requests.

 

Data Source(s): Administrative records; Web statistics; user surveys or questionnaires.

 

Purpose and Issues: Secondary distribution is an important component of reach because it measures demand and thus indirectly gauges perceived value, appropriateness, and quality. After primary distribution, requests result from learning about a product from the Internet, a library, a colleague, a flier, a listserv announcement, news release, review, index, bibliography, class reading list, etc. Recommendation of a colleague—“word of mouth”—is an effective form of publicity, especially when an organization can provide products to local, national, or international opinion leaders who can help further the reach of the product. This is a relatively easy indicator on which to collect information, at a low cost.

 

In some instances underreporting is an issue for this indicator, since secondary distribution cannot be tracked in its entirety. For example, it is not possible to count how many copies of the article, which was published in an open-access journal, are circulated among initial readers’ colleagues.

 

Examples:

From July 1, 2005 to June 30, 2006 the INFO Project sent out a total of 41,597 Population Reports in English, French, and Spanish in response to requests. 

 

Each year Horizons sends out an average of 500 copies of “Designing HIV/AIDS Intervention Studies: An Operations Research Handbook” in response to new requests.

 

 

Indicator 4:

Number of file downloads in a time period

 

Definition: “File downloads” refers to an Internet user’s transfer of content from a Web site to her or his own electronic storage medium.

 

Data Requirements: Web server log files.

 

Data Source(s): Web server log analysis software (e.g., WebTrends®, Google™ Analytics, IBM® Surfaid, HitBox, StatCounter, ClickTracks, and NetGenius).

Purpose and Issues: File downloads captured in a Web server log file provide insight into the types of information products and topics of products that are used the most among those offered on a Web site.  (A log file is a list of actions that have taken place.) Web site usage programs can also be used to get a general sense of which countries or regions and organizations are making most use of a Web site (see Appendix 4). When linked to special events, these statistics also can help pinpoint which promotional events reach online audiences most interested in a topic: Web site activity will increase after a promotional event.

 

The Web server normally produces log files automatically, so the raw data are readily available. The Web server reliably records every transaction it makes. Furthermore, the data are on the organization’s own servers. It is important to use caution, however, because Web site activity can also change due to unrelated events such as Web site upgrades, broken links, offline servers, and other problems. Also, log files contain information on visits from search engine spiders as well as from human users of the Internet. (A spider is code that automatically searches Web pages and fetches links to those pages.) Although visits by search engine spiders should not be reported as part of the human activity at the Web site, they are important information for search engine optimization of a Web site.

 

Switching log analysis software, as programs sometimes do for various reasons, limits the ability to assess trends, because different programs collect different information or define common terms in different ways. To address this problem, it may be feasible to use both old and new programs for a time and to compare the results, and/or to analyze historical data with the new program.  However, while log file analysis is easy to conduct, it is often difficult to interpret (see Appendix 4).

 

Example:

From January to September 2005, Family Health International’s online Research Ethics Training Curriculum was downloaded 43,877 times in English, 21,013 in French, and 50,860 in Spanish.

 

In its first week on the World Health Organization’s Web site, the entire 376-page file of Family Planning: A Global Handbook for Providers was downloaded 373 times.

 

Indicator 5:

 Number of times a product is reprinted by recipients

 

Definition: “Reprinting by recipient” refers to an organization, other than the one that authored, funded, published, or sponsored the product that uses its own resources to replicate the product or part of the product. For example, some users request permission to reproduce the entire product or a part of the product such as a graph, table, checklist, or chart. This indicator includes translations published by those other than the original publisher. Note: The initial print run and reprints from the original publisher are not included in this indicator.

 

Data Requirements: Requests for approval or permission to reprint, stating numbers reprinted. Copy of reprint or translation received over the transom.

 

Data Source(s): Letter, email, or other communication request or acknowledging, providing numbers reprinted. Receipt of product sent by publisher.

 

Purpose and Issues: Reprints demonstrate demand for the information products and extend the reach of a particular product beyond what was originally feasible. An added value of this indicator is that desire to reprint suggests an independent judgment that the product is useful and of high quality. One common form of republishing is inclusion of all or a large part of a text from another publisher in a set of training materials.

 

A limitation of this indicator is that the original publishers have to rely on what is reported to them or sent to them after reprinting, or that they happen across. It is not possible to know with certainty the extent of reprinting. (Some republishers think that they would not receive permission to reprint, and so they do not want to let the original publisher know.) Also, it may be difficult to find out the extent of dissemination and the use of the reprint.

 

Example:

In May 2004 ADRA International contained content from the Futures Group/POLICY Project’s “What Works: A Policy and Program Guide to the Evidence on Family Planning, Safe Motherhood, and STI/HIV/AIDS Interventions: Module 1: Safe Motherhood” in a training curriculum on reproductive health that includes a section on safe motherhood.

 

 

Indicator 6:

 Number of people reached by media coverage of the material or generated by it

Definition: Media articles or supplements and radio/TV broadcasts on key issues that result from a given information product or service.

 

Data Requirements: Number and description of articles and radio/TV broadcasts; audience reach of media outlets.

 

Data Source(s): Media outlets, clippings, reports on broadcasts, reports from clipping services; media industry statistics (for information on audiences).

Purposes and Issues: This indicator provides information on the extended reach of an information product or service through mass media coverage. This indicator can include media coverage about the publication itself and coverage of the issue addressed by the publication, if the publication has sparked that coverage.

 

It may be difficult to capture all instances of media coverage, however, especially broadcasts. When a news-making report comes out, staff can be organized to monitor various news media outlets for coverage of the story.

  

Example:

Print media coverage of FHI’s Cochrane Review on oral contraceptives and weight gain has reached as many as 19.5 million readers as of August 2007. Print coverage ranged from Parents Magazine and Ladies Home Journal to the Daily Mail and The Times. Millions more were reached through broadcast coverage.

 

 


Area 3: Referrals

 

Indicator 7:

Number of instances that products are indexed or archived in bibliographic databases

 

Definition: This indicator refers to selection of information products for inclusion in a bibliographic database. Examples of these types of databases include the National Library of Medicine's PubMED Central, BioMed Central, PAIS Index, POPLINE®, Social Science Citation or Science Citation, Medline/Index Medicus, EMBASE, Biological Abstracts/BIOSIS, and Scopus™. Databases such as USAID's Development Experience Clearinghouse (DEC) and other publicly available development-oriented
databases are included in this category. Typically, databases record such bibliographic information as authors, journal citation, authors' abstract, links to full text, if available, and/or to related articles, and sometimes cited references. These databases enable their users to search by author, topic, journal, and other criteria.

 

Data Requirements: Search results of bibliographic databases (online and hard copy).

 

Data Source(s): Bibliographic databases (online and hard copy).

 

Purpose and Issues: As noted earlier (see p. 15), this indicator relies on bibliometric research through tracing of citations or citation analysis.  Some of these databases, such as PubMed and BioMed, offer free access. (PubMed is the U.S. National Institutes of Health’s free digital archive of biomedical and life sciences journal literature.) Others are available only by paid subscription. Results for this indicator may be underreported if evaluators do not subscribe to certain databases requiring a subscription.

 

Products from well-known, developed-country publishers are more likely to be indexed, because publishers’ selection of products is considered to be a proxy for quality when the selection process is competitive (as it is for major journals in the social, medical, and biological sciences). In other words, the reputation of publishers and their use of peer review often determine whether their products are indexed. In fact, some databases include articles from a restricted list of journals only.

 

Some listings of information products will have abstracts; others will not. It should be noted that abstracts included in databases are a means of secondary dissemination of content, while a link to the entire article is a referral. Some users may only read an abstract to obtain basic information and not read the entire article. Others may use databases solely to identify sources, which they then obtain in full. Evaluators using this indicator need to consider whether to track citations in bibliographic databases as secondary dissemination or referral.

 

Example:

In March 2006 Futures Group staff published an article in the journal Science.The Global Impact of Scaling-Up HIV/AIDS Prevention Programs in Low-and Middle-Income Countries” was indexed in PubMed, ID#16456039 .

 

 

Indicator 8:

Number of postings of products by other Web sites or links to products from other Web sites

 

Definition: A “posting” is making the full text (for example, an Adobe® Portable Document Format (PDF) file of a product) available at a Uniform Resource Locator (URL) other than that of the original publisher. A “link” is providing the URL on another Web site that directs the users who click on the link to the original publisher’s Web site. These links are created by a user of the information product or service, not by the original publisher of the product.

 

Data Requirements: Data from links analysis software programs or from a search engine. Internet search engine to identify additional product postings.

 

Data Source(s): Links analysis software or a search engine or requests from users; findings from an Internet search.

 

Purpose and Issues: Links analysis looks at reach by measuring the numbers of Web sites linked to a Web site or specific product on a Web site. The number of links can be a proxy for authority—in other words, an indication that those who selected the links perceived the product to be of high quality and considered the site an authority on a particular subject. One program that conducts this analysis is called “link popularity” and can be accessed at http://www.linkpopularity.com/.

 

A simple Internet search with a search engine such as Google or Yahoo!® also will provide a list of links to the product other than the original publisher. The number of links found by a specific search engine reflects how thorough that search engine is. Search engines may not find a product that is not appropriately tagged (i.e., if keywords or metadata (information about particular content) do not appear in the right place).

  

Examples:

In August 2006 Pathfinder International's publication, "Preparing a Case Study: A Guide for Designing and Conducting a Case Study for Evaluation Input," was featured on the Communications Initiative home page for one week (http://www.comminit.com/#materials). In 2005 the Communications Initiative also featured Pathfinder's publication, "Preventing Mother-to-Child Transmission of HIV in Kenya." Both included links to Pathfinder International's Web site.

 

The WHO Web site hosts a downloadable copy of the PDF file of Family Planning: A Global Handbook for Providers at http://www.who.int/reproductive-health/publications/fp_globalhandbook/index.htm.

It also offers a link to related resources at the INFO Project’s Handbook Web site, http://www.fphandbook.org.

 

 

Indicator 9:

Number of instances that products are selected for inclusion in a library

 

Definition: This indicator refers to selection of information products of any type by a library or information center, whether it is public, academic, corporate, or organizational. The material may be purchased by a library in a developed country; sometimes developing country libraries can acquire materials at no cost or at a reduced price.

 

Data Requirements: Administrative data on the number of libraries receiving products.

 

Data Source(s): Administrative data.

 

Purpose and Issues: Selection of products for inclusion in libraries is a proxy measure of quality as well as reach, since librarians choose publications that they determine will meet the needs and interests of library users and that are worth the costs of acquisition, accessioning, and shelf space. Such judgments can be based on factors ranging from the reputations of the authors and the publisher to the presence of features such as indexes and bibliographies. Published reviews often influence librarians’ choices, too. Using similar criteria, librarians may also select materials for inclusion in bibliographies or resource lists. For example, a library Web site may recommend other sites as good sources of information on selected topics.

 

At the same time, publishers send products to libraries unsolicited, and the librarians then decide whether or not to include them in the library’s collection. It is difficult to know what librarians decide in these circumstances. In resource-poor settings librarians may opt to include in the collection all materials they receive, regardless of quality.

 

The definition of a library should be agreed upon at the outset when using this indicator.  What is called a library varies greatly even within a country. Defining terminology in advance will ensure that the data collected remain comparable.

 

Examples:

Between June 2006 and July 2006, five Pathfinder International publications were incorporated into the Southern Africa HIV/AIDS Information Dissemination Service (SAfAIDS) Library: HIV/AIDS Fact Sheets; “Monitoring & Evaluation Guides on Preparing a Case Study;” “In-Depth Interviews;” “Mystery Client Interviews;” and  “Mapping CHBC Services in Five Regions of the Tanzania Mainland.”

 

IUCD Method Briefs: A New Look at IUDs, published by FHI in collaboration with the Kenya Ministry of Health, is available in Kenyatta National Hospital Library, Kenya MOH Division of Reproductive Health Library, and Moi University Library, as well as in resource collections of 23 Kenyan NGOs.

 

Indicator 10:

Percentage of users who share their copies or transmit information verbally to colleagues

 

Definition: This indicator suggests how information is transmitted from person to person. Transmission may be through sharing a copy with another person or by word of mouth. 

 

Data Requirements: Name of product, number of copies shared, number with whom copies are shared or number referred to the product.

 

Data Source(s): Focus group discussions, key informant interviews, returned surveys, or Web statistics.

 

Purpose and Issues: Because publications are often scarce in developing countries, there is much more resource sharing than in developed countries. Most publications have readership far exceeding the number of copies distributed. Numbers for this indicator may be estimates unless an organization has an in-office circulation list, in which case the numbers can be easily counted. In the absence of a list, publishers probably may not know about additional pass-along and thus may underestimate the actual number of readers per copy.

 

Web statistics programs can track how many times people have clicked on “send to a friend” buttons, which is an electronic equivalent of sharing a print copy.

 

Example:

In Pathfinder’s Packard Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (ASRH) project, 70% of Philippine survey respondents shared their materials with others in their office, while 95% disseminated materials to either local branches of their organization or other smaller NGOs.