Skip Navigation

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health: The INFO Project

Your knowledge-sharing resource on family planning and reproductive health

Universal Navigation:
INFO Home  |  Order  |  e-lists  |  Search Web Site  |  Contact Us  |  Press  |  Site Map  |  Español/Francais

Shopping Basket

 
  Introduction
HIV/AIDS and Contraceptive Methods
Hormonal Methods Appropriate for Women with Depression
Criteria Reaffirmed for Broad-spectrum Antibiotics and Hormonal Methods, Cervical Neoplasia and COCs, Breastfeeding and Progestins
MEC for Patch and Ring Same as for Combined Pills; Implanon Implant MEC Same as for Norplant
Bibliography
Subscription and Ordering Information
Prepared by Ward Rinehart, M.A.
Bryant Robey, Editor
Design by Francine Mueller
Reviewed by Kathryn Church, Kathryn Curtis, Mary E. Gaffield, Sarah Johnson, Anshu Mohllajee, Kavita Nanda, Herbert Peterson and James D. Shelton.
Catherine Richey provided assistance.

Photo credit: David Alexander/CCP

Published by:
The INFO Project at the Johns Hopkins
Bloomberg School of Public Health
Center for Communication Programs.

INFO Reports is designed to provide an accurate and authoritative report on important developments in family planning and related health issues. The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the US Agency for International Development or the Johns Hopkins University.

USAID Logo


Published with support from USAID, Global, GH/POP/PEC, under the terms of Grant No.
GPH-A-00-02-00003-00.
MEC for Patch and Ring Same as for Combined Pills; Implanon Implant MEC Same as for Norplant

The Expert Working Group incorporated three new contraceptive methods into the MEC—the combined hormonal contraceptive patch, the combined hormone-releasing vaginal ring, and the etonogestrel-releasing implant, Implanon. The hormone levels and patterns typical of the patch and the ring are similar to those for COCs, as are the type and frequency of side effects reported in comparative studies. Therefore, the meeting concluded, MEC classifications applying to COCs can be assumed to apply to the patch and ring as well. There is no direct evidence concerning use of either method among women with health conditions. The meeting also assumed that the MEC classifications for the 5-year levonorgestrel implant Norplant can also apply to the 3-year etonogestrel implant Implanon.

The Expert Working Group reclassified implants and also progestin-only injectables and the levonorgestrel-releasing IUD as far as obesity is concerned. All were changed to category 1 (use in any circumstance) from category 2 (generally use). Research involving the progestin-only injectable Depo-Provera (DMPA) leaves unclear whether obese women have more health problems, including additional weight gain or more bleeding changes, than DMPA users of lower weight (4, 19, 21).

Since the October 2003 meeting new evidence has become available showing that the effectiveness of Norplant implants decreases after the fourth year of use for women weighing over 70 kg.

Previous | Next
INFO Reports Home | Top of Page

Disclaimer: The information provided on this web site is not official U.S. Government information and does not represent the views or positions of the U.S. Agency for International Development, the U.S. Government or The Johns Hopkins University.