CONTENTS

         Chapters
  1. The Importance of Quality
  2. The Quality Movement in Health Care
  3. Client-Centered Care
  4. Principles of Quality Movement
  5. Quality Design
  6. Quality Control
  7. Quality Improvement

HIGHLIGHTS

Population Reports is published by the Population Information Program, Center for Communication Programs, The Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, 111 Market Place, Suite 310, Baltimore, Maryland 21202-4012, USA


Volume XXVI, Number 3
November, 1998

Series J, Number 47
The Quality Movement in Health Care

Today's quality movement in health care and family planning draws on disparate roots in medicine and industry. Medicine historically has taken a watchdog approach, relying on government licensing, professional credentials, internal audits, and, more recently, external inspections to maintain standards, weed out poor performers, and solve problems. Industry has adopted a different philosophy over the past 50 years: training employees to prevent problems, strengthening organizational systems, and continually improving performance (34, 294). In the 1980s health care began adopting these approaches as well, and now they are also being applied in family planning and other primary care in developing countries.

Origins of the Quality Movement

Standards governing who could practice medicine date back to the first century A.D. in parts of India and China. In Europe efforts to license medical practitioners developed as early as 1140 in Italy and evolved into uniform educational standards, state examinations, and licensing in the 19th century (237, 330). In the US the modern quality assurance movement in health care began in 1917, when the American College of Surgeons compiled the first set of minimum standards for US hospitals to find and eliminate poor care (38, 50). This approach evolved into an accreditation process now managed by the Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (38, 76, 178).

In the 1980s weaknesses in the inspection process, the persistence of poor quality, and the emergence of new management techniques in industry, together with rising costs, led health care professionals in developed countries to begin reassessing accreditation and standards-based quality assurance (194, 262, 305). US health care organizations began testing the industrial philosophies of Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) and Total Quality Management (TQM) (38, 194). At the same time, the hospital accreditation system expanded its focus from inspections to promoting quality improvement (50, 305). In the UK the National Health Service adopted a formal quality policy in 1991 and recognized CQI as the most cost-effective way to implement it (262).

Understanding CQI and TQM

Definitions of CQI and TQM vary. While CQI focuses on industrial methods and TQM, on management philosophy, the terms often are used interchangeably because of their shared history and assumptions (186). CQI and TQM are based on the work of pioneers in industrial management such as W. Edwards Deming, Joseph Juran, Armand Fiegenbaum, and Kaoru Ishikawa. These people helped transform Japan's industrial sector in the 1950s by applying statistical methods to management of production processes, by making client satisfaction the focus of all operations, and by empowering employees through teamwork and shared decision-making (262). Since then, CQI and TQM theories and methods have been adopted by many different types of organizations worldwide, including health care and government organizations (52, 62, 129, 154).

These approaches contend that good quality should be designed into products and processes at the start, to prevent problems from ever arising. Inspections are important, to reject substandard products or services, but they cannot raise the quality of products or services produced (79). Therefore, quality management practitioners have devised a series of tools and methods for managers and employees to strengthen organizational systems, prevent problems, and improve quality (62, 262).

Still, health care differs from consumer product industries in two important ways: First, most clients lack the knowledge to judge technical quality in health care and family planning; second, a client's physical well-being and sometimes very life, not just satisfaction and loyalty, may depend on the quality of services. Therefore conventional quality control methods, such as licensing, standard setting, and accreditation, remain uniquely important in health care to eliminate substandard care and protect clients (9).


Previous | Next
Top of Page | Table of Contents


111 Market Place, Suite 310, Baltimore, MD 21202, USA
Phone: (410) 659.6300/Fax: (410) 659.6266/E-mail: Poprepts@jhuccp.org

Population Reports