CONTENTS

        Chapters
  1. Research and Regulatory Approval
  2. Use of Injectables
  3. Effectiveness and Reversibility
  4. Side Effects and Complications
  5. More Evidence in the Cancer Debate
  6. Noncontraceptive Health Benefits
  7. Counseling Issues
  8. Communicating with the Public
  9. Maximizing Access and Quality

Published with this issue:

HIGHLIGHTS


Published by the Population Information Program, Center for Communication Programs, The Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, 111 Market Place, Suite 310, Baltimore, Maryland 21202-4012, USA

Volume XXIII, Number 2 August 1995

Cervical Cancer

DMPA. The WHO study found no increased risk of invasive cervical cancer (see
Table 6). There were no trends in risk of invasive cancer by duration of use or time since first or last use. Researchers controlled for the sexual behavior of the women and their husbands and for a history of sexually transmitted diseases, among other variables (303).

The study reported a slightly increased risk of cervical cancer in situ (cancer confined to the epithelium, the surface layer of the cervix)—1.25 among women with symptoms (statistically significant). To avoid screening bias—more detection of cancer in situ without symptoms among DMPA users because they were seeing providers more regularly than nonusers—the researchers emphasize the findings for women who had symptoms at diagnosis. The researchers conclude from these findings—increased risk of in situ but not invasive cancer—that the in situ lesions induced by DMPA may be reversible or that they do not lead to invasive cancer (304). Other studies of cervical cancer among DMPA users have found no significant increased risk of cervical dysplasia (precancerous lesions) (221, 222), cancer in situ, or invasive cancer (227).

Monthly injectables. The only published study devoted exclusively to monthly injectables concluded that users may have a slightly increased risk of cervical cancer (relative risk of 1.3). The report, which analyzed data collected in the WHO study, involved women in Chile and Mexico who had used a monthly injectable containing dihydroxyprogesterone acetophenide and an estrogen, usually estradiol enanthate (300).

Endometrial Cancer

Women who use DMPA reduce their risk of endometrial cancer, according to the WHO study. Thai women using DMPA had a relative risk of 0.2 compared with nonusers (see Table 6). The protective effect lasted for more than 12 years after first use and 8 years after last use. Since only three women with endometrial cancer had used DMPA, the study could not tell whether risk declined with duration of use.

The protective effect of DMPA may be even stronger than the WHO study suggests. All three DMPA users who had endometrial cancer had also taken estrogen to regulate bleeding. Estrogen increases risk of endometrial cancer (317).

Epethelial Ovarian Cancer

The WHO study found no association between use of DMPA and epithelial ovarian cancer (291), which accounts for more than 90% of ovarian cancers (67). The overall relative risk among DMPA users was 1.1, not statistically significant. The study found no pattern of risk related to duration of use, time since first or last use, or age at first use (291).

The failure to find a protective effect is surprising. Like OCs, DMPA prevents ovulation, which reduces the risk of ovarian cancer. Thus the injectable should offer similar protection against ovarian cancer. Women who have ever used OCs have about two-thirds the risk of ovarian cancer of nonusers, and use for five years or more cuts the risk of ovarian cancer in half (290).

Liver Cancer

The two studies of liver cancer and injectable contraceptives, the WHO study and a South African study, report no increased risk. The WHO study reported results for Kenya and Thailand, the only countries where DMPA use is high enough to assess the risk of liver cancer. The relative risk of liver cancer among Kenyan DMPA users was 1.6, and among Thai users, 0.3. The researchers have more confidence in the Thai data because most of the cases of liver cancer were confirmed histologically in Thailand, but only about one-third were confirmed histologically in Kenya (269). The South African study found that users of progestin-only injectables had a relative risk of liver cancer of 0.4, not statistically significant but, like the Thai data, suggesting a protective effect (159).

Previous | Next
Top of Page | Table of Contents


111 Market Place, Suite 310, Baltimore, MD 21202, USA
Phone: (410) 659.6300/Fax: (410) 659.6266/E-mail: Poprepts@jhuccp.org

Population Reports