![]() CONTENTS
HIGHLIGHTS
Published in collaboration with:
The Center for Health and Gender Equity (CHANGE) is a research and advocacy organization that seeks to integrate concern for gender equity and social justice into international health policy and practice. CHANGE staff can be reached by e-mail at change@genderhealth.org or at http://www.genderhealth.org.
December, 1999
Series L, Number 11 |
Asking About AbuseLack of confidentiality can be particularly devastating, as well as placing women at risk for further abuse. A women in Zimbabwe complained, “I went to the hospital because my husband beat me when I got pregnant. What hurt me was that there was no confidentiality by the doctors and nurses treating me. Everyone in the ward got to know that I had been beaten by my husband” (465). For many women, facing indifference and hostility from health personnel is like being victimized again by the very system that is supposed to help. One Latin American woman who went to a health center said, “I felt hurt, wounded, because when you go, you hope that someone would at least give you a little help. But when you get there you feel even more dejected.... They don't give you any encouragement.... They treat you like the cashier in the supermarket” (202). A Panamanian woman who miscarried as a result of her husband's beatings described her experience with the health center in this way:
When the doctor attended me, I explained to him what happened, that I had been beaten, and I said, “I know this isn't your job, but I need a favor. My husband is outside in the hallway, and I need you to call a policeman to help me stop him before he catches me again.” The doctor answered that this wasn't his problem, that I was free to leave however I wanted. He just said, “Take this for the swelling” and left me alone in the room. (347) “It is my impression that some women have been waiting their whole lives for someone to ask,” notes Ana Flavia d'Oliveria, a Brazilian public health physician who began an abuse screening program among her prenatal care patients (213). In fact, most women, regardless of whether they have been abused themselves, feel that physicians should routinely ask their patients about abuse (71, 161). Among South African women attending a community health clinic in Cape Town, for example, 88% said they would welcome routine inquiry about violence during health visits (251). The way in which a woman is asked about violence makes an enormous difference to whether she will disclose her situation. If asked about violence in a nonjudgmental, empathic way, she is more likely to answer truthfully. Women are more inclined to discuss abuse if they perceive the clinician to be caring and easy to talk to, and if follow-up is offered (293, 379).
When there are obvious signs of abuse, such as unexplained injuries, health workers should ask, “Who did this to you?” If there are no signs, clinicians have found that the best way to ask about violence is to bring it up routinely as part of taking a clinical history (see How to Ask About Abuse of the Pullout Guide). For example, the provider can say, “Because violence is so common these days, I ask all my patients whether they have ever been hurt by someone close to them.” This phrasing can help to keep a woman from feeling that she has been singled out for questions. Several short screening questionnaires have been developed to help health care providers identify victims of abuse (120, 146, 295). At one prenatal clinic, detection of lifetime violence rose from 14% with routine inquiry during a social service interview to 41% using the 5-question Abuse Assessment Screen (328). Another study found that asking three brief questions correctly identified the majority of abused women:
There is no international consensus on whether all women should be routinely screened for violence when they visit a health care facility. Some advocates argue that failure to screen is a serious breach in the quality of health care (49). Others feel that screening all women on every visit may not be feasible, particularly where budgets are low and personnel are overworked. Some express concern that identifying women who are abused may be counterproductive if there are no services or resources to offer them and could lead to greater frustration for both clients and providers (277). Each health service should decide upon a detection policy that best meets its clients' needs and local resources. Options other than universal screening include: Ask when there are signs of abuse. Without asking, it is difficult to identify women suffering abuse. Providers should keep in mind that, contrary to popular belief, physical injury is not the most common symptom of abuse in women. More common are chronic vague complaints with no obvious physical cause. Such complaints and other key symptoms raise “red flags” about domestic violence and sexual abuse that should arouse providers' suspicions (166, 343, 370) (see How to Ask About Abuse of the Pullout Guide). When one or more of these symptoms are present, health workers should ask directly about abuse. Strategic screening. Another option is to screen all women for abuse in certain services that are considered strategic because of the number of abused women attending them, because special risks are involved, or because they present good opportunities for discussing abuse. Routine screening might be especially appropriate in the following services:
|
![]() |
Information & Knowledge for Optimal Health (INFO) Project 111 Market Place Suite 310, Baltimore, MD 21202 Phone: 410-659-6300 Fax: 410-659-6266 Security & Privacy Policy |
![]() |